Textuality » 3PLSC Textuality

BDelbianco-rubric's translation group 5-listening and comprehension and synthesis
by BDelBianco - (2018-12-03)
Up to  3P LSC - Building Up Vocabulary for Next Class TestUp to task document list

Peculiar aspects

Which aspects do I consider?

 

Criteria

Indicators

Levels of fluency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial

(not achieved competence)

Basic

(partial)

Intermediate

(appropriate)

Advanced

(admirable)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LISTENING AND COMPREHENSION

 

 

The notes underline:

-focalisation on the assigned task

- pertinence of the annotations with the aim of the task

-completeness of information/ argumentations/

considerations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline:

- the dicussed problem fundamental aspects

- pertinence of information

- quantity and quality of information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline:

- the listening general aspects

- insufficient information

- no qualitative reference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline:

- pertinence with the assigned task

- the discussed problem relevant aspects

- the essential information

- a few qualitative examples

- a few quantitative references

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline:

- content completeness

- aim awareness of the assigned task

- all the discussed problem relevant aspects

- most of the examples given by the speaker

- most of the quantitative references

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline:

- pertinence and focalisation on the assigned task aim

- clear and reasoned list of all the significant aspects of the problem discussed

- information completeness and quantitative and qualitative references

- all the offered significant examples

- open reported questions on the diachronic level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline ability of:

- selection

-hierarchization of the presented information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The notes underline:

- ability to distinguish main and secondary information

- ability to distinguish information and argumentations/ justifications presented during the conference

-comprehension of the relations between information and argumentations

- ability to make inferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline:

- the understanding of some speech fragments

- confusion between main and secundary information

- a limited number of information ordered randomly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline:

- correct selection and distinction of the essential main and secundary information

- the presence of the main information/ justifications offered during the conference

- the comprehension of a few relations between information and argumentations

- their hierarchy relationship

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline:

- precise distinction of most of the main and secundary information

- correct and detailed selection of the annotated information and argumentations

- correct understanding of the logical-argumentative hierarchy

- inference ability

- comprehension of the relations between information and argumentations

- correct distinction between facts and opinions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The notes underline:

- completeness of the obtained information and argumentations

- aware and correct hierarchy of the information and argumentations

- selection ability and detailed comprehension of their hierarchical relations

- inference ability

- awareness of the relation between quantitative data and qualitative data

- the open issues evidenc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SYNTHESIS

 

The notes underline:

-the knot of the task

-a clear and reasoned organization

 

The notes allow to:

-reconstruct the

argumentative line

-identify keywords

-quantitative and qualitative data

-identify the open issues

-solicit reflections

-center the messages launched/ the proposed solution/ the indications provided

 

The notes underline:

-some keywords

-confusion and fragmentation

-unidentifiable argumentative line

 

The notes allow to:

-identify the most frequent keywords

-identify the most significant information of the task

-derive the essential elements of the argumentative line

-derive data

-partial qualitative

-identify the conference’s message

 

The notes allow to:

-derive the keywords and the concepts underlying the task

-easily get the focus of the task

-immediately identify the logical-argumentative line

-identify the proposed message

 

-identify the open issues

 

The notes underline:

-the task’s focus in a clear and effective way

-annotations make explicit the reasoned organization of the task

-keywords for the immediate identification of the argumentative line

-relevance and significance of the message

-qualitative and quantitative data supporting the issues/ problems raised

-open questions that solicit critical reflections