Textuality » 3LSCA Interacting

ESavorgnan - WEEK III - Correction
by ESavorgnan - (2020-03-27)
Up to  3LSCA - 3 WEEK: 16 - 22nd March, 2020 - Online Study for Prolonged School Closure.Up to task document list

CORRECTION SHEET – WEEK III

 

Activity on connectors 1

3. In spite of

4. Even so

 

 

B2 Listening Activities

 

Exercise 1

4. E

5. G

 

Exercise 2

13. Assigment

 

 

 

Analysis of “The Dove”, by Langston Hughes

In the present text I am going to analyse The Dove, a poem written by Langston Hughes in the ‘60s.

Considering the title a reader would expect the poem to be about birds, meaning freedom because of their ability to fly away; the poetry may also focalise on doves, which are the symbol, due to religion, of peace. Their colour is as white as purity, innocence and redemption, so it reminds to a sense of perfection, something which is impossible to reach.

The poem is made by one stanza, written in free verse, another link to freedom and spontaneity. It starts and ends with three dots: this means the poem tells a story not from its beginning and ends without closing the argument; this requires the ability to imagine what the poet chase to overlook.

In the second line the poet introduces an aged Picasso; the intelligent reader asks why that painter. The answer is that Picasso drew many times doves in his paintings; such has in the Geneva Convention’s logo and in the famous Guernica.

There is a common strand between his works, the peace: a declaration of human rights was written in the worldwide conference, and the Guernica is linked to a war.

The poem could be divided in two different and contrasting parts: the first one, from verses 1 to 5, and the second one, between verses 5 and 9.

In the first part there is a personification of the peace in the dove, as I told; peace is as white as doves and “as fragile as pottery”: it is pure and special but also not a factual data; no one has to think that peace is reached and war beaten.

The second part is connected to colours, dark ones; it reminds to gloomy thoughts and directly to war. It is particular that the poet wrote these lines like he was lacking them; he wanted to tell that war is, in contrast to peace, a factual data: it belongs to humanity, battle grounds are “our old battle grounds”.

Words used help to underline what is written; an example is the alliteration of sounds “d” and “a”; the first one conveys the strength and the importance of words (examples are dove, dreams, dark, ground), the second one appeases the poem including melancholy (dove, our, ground). There is also an echo-effect, which highlights the distance of the experiences told.

In this poem the poet showed his ability to build imagines and to create a sense of suspense, helped by the language which is referred to sight, colours and a constant sense of unspoken.