Considering the title, the reader assumes that the field of art will be dealt with within the poem. The adjective that accompanies the noun allows the reader to reduce the image of the topics to a single and unique artistic sphere, encouraging him even more to discover what art it is and therefore to read the poem.

Before coming across the text, the reader pays attention to the layout.

the poem appears orderly, divided into 4 tercet and a quatrain.  It has also the rhymes and its rhyme scheme is ABA and ABAA in the last stanza

To discover the reason why the poem is divided in this way, we must proceed with the reading of the text.

In the first triplet the writer introduces the art she will talk about.

stresses that the art of losing is not complicated and not even a disaster, enticing (once again) the reader to continue reading.

In the second stanza the actress gives a practical example to justify the simplicity it takes to learn this art.

In third tercet the author stops explaining and gives advice to the reader on how to "lose" always highlighting how much this is not wrong.

In the fourth and fifth tercets, after having imposed on the reader a way to learn the art of losing, the author talks about how she has lost and continues to lose. Once again stresses that losing is not a problem, how simple it is to learn it.

Finally, in the last stanza, which is a quatrain, the author addresses the reader and emphasizes how losing may seem like a disaster but it is not with a direct speach. She speaks to a “you” that is somebody had a lost. 

The poetess says that losing thingh/ object is not important, but becomes more difficult when we lose people. For this situation we need to learn the art of survival after a lost, it must becomes an art for us, something we can do easily, because in a life it happens a lot of important people.