Textuality » 4ALS Interacting

FPavoni - Article by "The Economist"
by FPavoni - (2014-01-14)
Up to  4ALS - Newspaper ArticlesUp to task document list

Diabetes in Latin America

 

Unskinny genes

New research suggests a genetic susceptibility to the disease

Jan 4th 2014 | From the print edition



IF STRAINING waistlines were still a sign of prosperity, Mexicans would be rich. These days, girth is more likely to signal sickness. Diabetes is a particular scourge. The type-2 (or late-onset) variety, which is linked to obesity, is thought to afflict 11m Mexicans. It kills 73,000 of them a year, seven times as many as organised crime.

Lack of exercise and a penchant for fatty treats and fizzy drinks—of which Mexicans quaff 40% more, on average, than Americans do—are largely to blame. But that does not explain why, despite similar obesity rates, nearly one in six Mexican adults is diabetic but less than 10% of those north of the border are.

Scientists have long suspected that genes are at work. Writing in the journal Nature, researchers for the appositely named Slim Initiative in Genomic Medicine for the Americas (SIGMA) have now fingered a culprit: a variant of a little-known gene called SLC16A11, which regulates one of the ways that fat is stored in cells. Inherit a copy from one parent and your risk of diabetes rises by 25%. Get one from both and it rises by 50%.

Researchers at the consortium—named after Carlos Slim, a Mexican telecoms mogul and its biggest benefactor—found at least one copy in half of the genomes of the 8,000-odd Mexicans living in Mexico City and Los Angeles they looked at (some diagnosed with type-2 diabetes, others healthy). The variant seems to come from the cohort’s Native American ancestors. Indeed, it is all but absent from better-studied European and African genomes, one reason it had not been spotted earlier. The Native Americans, in turn, appear to have inherited it from Neanderthals: a version of the gene was recently discovered in Neanderthal remains in Russia.

Most non-African humans carry around 2% of Neanderthal DNA, the result of interbreeding when both species lived side by side in Europe up to 30,000 years or so ago. Why, then, did Native Americans, and not Europeans, get stuck with the diabetes gene? Jose Florez of Massachusetts General Hospital, one of the paper’s co-authors, thinks the answer lies in the Bering Strait.

As small bands of humans, some carrying the gene, headed east, the variant appears to have spread, leaving one in ten contemporary East Asians with a copy. The smaller the initial population, the likelier a random mutation is to become ubiquitous. If the variant had hitched a ride with the pioneers who crossed the land bridge from Siberia to Alaska, it might have proliferated among their offspring.

Dr Florez cautions against genetic fatalism. In 1993 Mexican genomes were no different to today’s but diabetes rates were about half what they are now. What changed was diet and exercise. Now they know which gene to look for, boffins should be better able to diagnose and treat people most at risk—cajoling them to eat less and move around more, for example. If Dr Florez is right about the prehistory, SIGMA’s findings will also be relevant to other countries in the region with large mestizo populations descended from indigenous peoples.

 

 

 

 

ON HE WEB:

 

 

http://www.economist.com/news/americas/21592621-new-research-suggests-genetic-susceptibility-disease-unskinny-genes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Why would anyone read this newspaper article?

  • Why that language is used?

  • What difficulties can give in terms of content and language?

 

 

On one side, anyone who would read this newspaper article may be interested in obesity or may have a friend or a kin that is obese or diabetic.

Reading this text, the reader would understand more about these illnesses and the topic in general.

Maybe someone may be interested in reading this article because he wants to understand how the situation is evolving and if there are any treatments that could save lives.

On the other hand, people may be not curious and they have not the desire to read it; a person could has not the time to read an article about people's health, anyone else wants to read sports magazine instead of an article on global economy or a particular event.

Perhaps there are obese or diabetic people who do not want to read the article because they do not want to feel taken into cause and accused of unhealthy lifestyles and not look for a solution to their problems.

The article's language is simple; the reporter may have used this kind of language, full of statistics and comparisons with other countries, both to emphasize the problem, which is present mainly in Mexico, is to make the article can be read even for the smallest, with the purpose of protecting the health of the younger before it's too late.

The statistical data and studies in the laboratory are explained clearly so that they can be understood by all people; indeed, they also make the text more direct, almost to convince the reader that these diseases are dangerous and should not be taken lightly.





One of the difficulties that you may encounter in the reading of the article is given by the presence of statistics, which can be considered boring by some, so do not induce the reader to go along with the reading.

Another difficulty is given by the argument mentioned in the article is because men tend to always be at the center of everything, and if a problem does not touch directly the individual, then you do not need to know anything about the subject.