Textuality » 3A Interacting

ADonat - Opinions - Functions - Argumentations
by ADonat - (2008-10-16)
Up to  Opinions - Functions - ArgumentationsUp to task document list
 

OPINIONS

 

•0.        Sandra informed Peter that informing Carol about the situation had been a big mistake.

•0.        Sandra also thought that Carol was very cheek because she didn't belive her and didn't think that Sandra was trying to help her.      

•0.        Peter told Sandra that she didn't worry about the situation because Carol would forget all about it. 

 

LINGUISTIC FUNCTIONS

 

Sandra: You were right, Peter.

Peter: Did you speak to Carol?

Sandra: Yes, I did. And it was a big mistake. I should have listened to you

Peter: Why? What happened?

Sandra: I told her I had seen Terry at the disco with Sharon . But she just got angry with me.

She accused me of exaggerating the whole thing. And she said I was just jealous because I didn't have a boy friend . What a cheek!

Peter: I told you not to get involved.

Sandra: I know. I shouldn't have said anything.

Peter: Wasn't she annoyed with Terry?

Sandra: No. She said she was sure he could explain everything.

Peter: Oh well, never mind. You were only trying to help. She'll soon forget about it.

Sandra: Yes, I suppose so. The trouble with Carol is that she doesn't know who real friends are.

 

 

 

 

ARGUMENTATIONS

Sandra's argumentations were that:

if she didn't tell Carol about the situation, Carol wouldn't get angry with Sandra.

 

In my opinion there aren't Peter's argumentations .

 

REACTIONS

 

Carol's reactions were that:

She accused Sandra of exaggerating the whole thing and she added that Sandra had just been jealous because she hadn't got a boyfriend yet.

 

CONSEQUENCES

 

The consequences were that Carol got angry with her because she thought that Sandra was lying, so Peter was trying to console her.